Author: Jean-Roux van Huyssteen
In South Africa, the issue of diesel refunds has been a contentious one, particularly concerning the withholding of refunds by SARS during audits. The Customs and Excise Act 91 of 1964 (“Customs Act”) governs the diesel refund system, aiming to alleviate the impact of fuel prices on primary producers. Despite the legal framework in place, taxpayers have faced challenges in receiving their entitled refunds, leading to legal disputes and financial strains.
One key aspect of contention has been SARS' practice of withholding refunds during audits, citing various reasons such as the need for additional documentation or ongoing verifications. While SARS has legal authority to withhold refunds for certain tax types during audits, the Customs Act does not explicitly grant this power for diesel refunds. This discrepancy has led to disputes over the legality of withholding refunds during audits, especially when audits extend for prolonged periods, causing financial strain on taxpayers.
The recent judgment in the case of Glencore Operations SA v Commissioner for SARS sheds light on the legal intricacies surrounding diesel refunds. The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the list of activities qualifying for diesel refunds under the Customs Act is exhaustive, emphasizing the need for detailed evidence and adherence to the prescribed activities for refunds to be granted. This ruling underscores the importance of clarity and compliance with the provisions of the Act to ensure the smooth processing of refund claims.
Taxpayers, facing cash flow strains and loss of interest due to delayed refunds, are urged to assert their rights and demand timely payment of their entitled refunds. The legal framework under the Customs Act mandates SARS to pay out diesel refunds promptly, even during audits, to prevent undue financial burdens on taxpayers. The lack of interest payable on delayed refunds further emphasizes the need for efficient and fair processing of refund claims to uphold taxpayers' rights and financial stability.
In conclusion, the Customs Act in South Africa provides a clear framework for diesel refunds, emphasizing taxpayers' entitlement to these refunds even during audits. The recent legal developments and challenges faced by taxpayers highlight the importance of transparency, efficiency, and adherence to the law in ensuring that taxpayers receive their entitled refunds without undue delays or financial hardships.
Intellectual property disclaimer:
The contents of any article published by Pieterse Sellner Erasmus should not be construed as professional legal advice.